<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Eschew Obfuscation: The Least Annoying Apps Will Win</title>
    <link>http://blog.maxdunn.com/articles/2006/06/28/the-least-annoying-application-will-win</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Max Dunn's Personal Blog</description>
    <item>
      <title>The Least Annoying Apps Will Win</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Back in the 80s and 90s when basic PC applications like word processors were being developed, there were a lot of holes in what they could do. Even rudimentary features like numbered lists, foreign character support and tables were often missing. So users frantically upgraded to each new release to gain new features they could actually use.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;However, at some point, the new features stopped becoming useful to most people. Sure there would be a few esoteric new features that a small percentage of people would use, but for most users, these new features just made the programmer bigger, slower and harder to use. This was the age of feature bloat.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:23:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:4896de45-62e3-4eec-b94b-2cd1a07c8e22</guid>
      <author>Max Dunn</author>
      <link>http://blog.maxdunn.com/articles/2006/06/28/the-least-annoying-application-will-win</link>
      <category>Random Thoughts</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
