<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Eschew Obfuscation: Growth of Wind Power</title>
    <link>http://blog.maxdunn.com/articles/2008/10/21/growth-of-wind-power</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Max Dunn's Blog</description>
    <item>
      <title>Growth of Wind Power</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Many people are dismissing wind power as irrelevant in solving our energy problem since wind power has been in production for a long time but the total output is still relatively small. However, it is useful to compare the ramp-up of wind power to nuclear power:&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2131/2959558928_5410fbd542.jpg?v=0" alt="" width=100% /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;It is interesting how closely these two growth curves align! In the US today, nuclear provides about 20% of our electricity so it is not unreasonable to assume that wind power can be ramped up to eventually provide the same percentage of power.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;(References: &lt;a href="http://europe.theoildrum.com/node/4670"&gt;The Oil Drum &amp;#8211; Making the case for wind, again&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.ewec2008.info/fileadmin/ewea_documents/documents/publications/reports/purepower.pdf"&gt;Pure Power &amp;#8211; Wind Energy Scenarios up to 2030&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:07:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:8b43f5d5-6c1e-4a95-b76a-f033e8112f31</guid>
      <author>Max Dunn</author>
      <link>http://blog.maxdunn.com/articles/2008/10/21/growth-of-wind-power</link>
      <category>Sustainable Energy</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

