<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Eschew Obfuscation: EEStor UltraCaps - Too Good To Be True?</title>
    <link>http://blog.maxdunn.com/articles/2008/07/09/eestor-ultracaps-too-good-to-be-true</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Max Dunn's Blog</description>
    <item>
      <title>EEStor UltraCaps - Too Good To Be True?</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If EEStor can achieve what they claim, it will blow open the electric vehicle market which is currently held back only by battery technology. Here is what they claim:&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;ol&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;For a 52 kWh unit, an initial production price of $3,200, falling to $2,100. &lt;/li&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;No degradation from charge/discharge cycles&lt;/li&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;4-6 minute charge time assuming sufficient cooling of the cables.&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;/ol&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Currently, a lithium battery pack this size would cost more than $30,000, would last less than 2,000 cycles and takes at least a couple of hours to charge.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;However, EEStor is a private company and is not releasing much information to be able to verify their claims. Let&amp;#8217;s hope that they are successful!&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;(Ref: &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EEStor"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EEStor&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:56:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:95ed81ba-5dc8-437d-b777-00ea2e2dbb70</guid>
      <author>Max Dunn</author>
      <link>http://blog.maxdunn.com/articles/2008/07/09/eestor-ultracaps-too-good-to-be-true</link>
      <category>Electric Vehicles</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

