<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheets/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Eschew Obfuscation: Independent Summary For Policymakers (ISPM)</title>
    <link>http://blog.maxdunn.com/articles/2008/02/29/independent-summary-for-policymakers-ispm</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Max Dunn's Personal Blog</description>
    <item>
      <title>Independent Summary For Policymakers (ISPM)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is the scientific body that researches climate change for the United Nations (UN) and released their Fourth Assesment Report (AR4) in 2007. There are numerous experts participating in the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;IPCC&lt;/span&gt;, and a lot of good science is contained in these reports.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;However, there is a big problem with the summary that is included with the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;IPCC&lt;/span&gt; report &amp;#8211; the Summary For Policymakers (SPM). This summary is not written by the scientists themselves but by unnamed bureaucratic delegates from the participating countries. As such, they tend to oversimplify and bias the actual results contained in the full report.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;So I found that the &lt;a href="http://www.uoguelph.ca/%7Ermckitri/research/ISPM.pdf" title="ISPM"&gt;Independent Summary For Policymakers&lt;/a&gt; to be more balanced and representative of the actual report than the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;SPM&lt;/span&gt; itself. The &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ISPM&lt;/span&gt; was prepared by qualified experts, but who were not themselves &lt;span class="caps"&gt;IPCC&lt;/span&gt; chapter authors. The &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ISPM&lt;/span&gt; was subject to expert review and the reviewer&amp;#8217;s responses are tabulated so there is a clear record to the extent that the reviewers agreed or disagreed with the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ISPM&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:07:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:994a85c6-3827-4d37-9c23-6305eb538f00</guid>
      <author>Max Dunn</author>
      <link>http://blog.maxdunn.com/articles/2008/02/29/independent-summary-for-policymakers-ispm</link>
      <category>Global Warming</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Independent Summary For Policymakers (ISPM)" by Lester</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#8217;s sad that there should be much difficulties in settling issues for the environment. Im thinking it should be as easy as just doing what is right, little by little on your own.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 07:10:35 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:d9535941-d9c9-4bf0-a0e3-a867edffddff</guid>
      <link>http://blog.maxdunn.com/articles/2008/02/29/independent-summary-for-policymakers-ispm#comment-526</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
