<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Eschew Obfuscation: Which Alternate Energy Vehicle is the Most Efficient?</title>
    <link>http://blog.maxdunn.com/articles/2008/01/24/which-alternate-energy-vehicle-is-the-most-efficient</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Max Dunn's Personal Blog</description>
    <item>
      <title>Which Alternate Energy Vehicle is the Most Efficient?</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There are several better energy alternatives to power cars than using gas. The top ones are hydrogen, air or battery. However, it turns out that there are big differences in the efficiencies of these technologies. For 100MJ of input electricity, this is how far each of these cars could go: [18]&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;133 km: Lithium-ion battery vehicle&lt;/li&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;46 km: Compressed air car&lt;/li&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;42 km: Fuel cell vehicle&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;So it turns out that battery electric vehicles are 3 times more efficient than either compressed air or fuel cell vehicles!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:33:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:afac922e-a94a-41d7-a5ce-552a13d1b425</guid>
      <author>Max Dunn</author>
      <link>http://blog.maxdunn.com/articles/2008/01/24/which-alternate-energy-vehicle-is-the-most-efficient</link>
      <category>Electric Vehicles</category>
      <category>Global Warming</category>
      <category>Peak Oil</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
